A string of skeletal pics of the SA born model appear in the new Victoria’s Secret catalogue. I’m appalled by them. Are you?
We just rejoiced and told you how curves such as model Kate Upton’s should be used and celebrated more.
Now this.
What's worse? It’s not Victoria’s Secret’s first Photoshop flop. Or second. Or third. Or heck, even fourth!
No doubt our Candice is tiny. But, come on... These images can’t possibly be real?
• Where is her bum?
• Where are her thighs?
And more importantly,
• When are the eds of these glossies ever going to learn?
Click here to view the pics that I'm talking about.
Follow Meagan on Twitter.
Do you see the blunder here?
By: Meagan Karstens
|
No, Candice is not Photoshopped thinner.
|
12 % 78 votes
12
|
|
|
No, these images look good.
|
18 % 115 votes
18
|
|
|
Yes, it’s horrid!
|
57 % 360 votes
57
|
|
|
Yes, but it’s nice.
|
13 % 83 votes
13
|
|
Suggest a vote